Et mål for gruppearbeidet i en PLA-prosess er å finne ut

og

hva som er reell uenighet man respekterer mye bedre

……………………………………….………………Ved starten av en prosess…………………………Ved slutten……..

Konsensus/flertallsmeining utvikles ofte og gir handlekraft og er viktig av den grunn

Uviktige reelle uenigheter bør man ikke spandere mye tid på - men prosessen med å finne fram til sann uenighet i viktige spørsmål for den ene eller den andre utvikler toleranse/respekt for de ulike syn som tilslutt blir igjen.

The purpose of this checklist is to guide evaluations from a deliberative democratic perspective. Such evaluation incorporates democratic processes within the evaluation to secure better conclusions. The aspiration is to construct valid conclusions where there are conflicting views. The approach extends impartiality by including relevant interests, values, and views so that conclusions can be unbiased in value as well as factual aspects. Relevant value positions are included, but are subject to criticism the way other findings are. Not all value claims are equally defensible. The evaluator is still responsible for unbiased data collection, analysis, and arriving at sound conclusions. The guiding principles are inclusion, dialogue, and deliberation, which work in tandem with the professional canons of research validity.